• A
  • A
  • Ruimtestation onder vuur

    - Het is onduidelijk wat de NASA wil en kan bereiken met het ruimtestation ISS. Het GAO, rekenkamer van de Amerikaanse regering, wijst er op, dat het station al in 2015 zou stoppen, terwijl pas vanaf 2010 echt onderzoek gedaan kan worden. Bovendien gaat de Shuttle komend jaar met pensioen, zodat verkeer op en neer ook nog kwestieus dreigt te worden.

    Het General Accounting Office komt met de volgende analyse en aanbevelingen:

    The ISS has been continuously staffed since 2000 and now has a six-member crew. The primary objective for the ISS through 2010 is construction, so research utilization has not been the priority. Some research has been and is being conducted as time and resources permit while the crew on board performs assembly tasks, but research will is expected to begin in earnest in 2010.

    NASA projects that it will utilize approximately 50 percent of the U.S. ISS research facilities for its own research, including the Human Research Program, opening the remaining facilities to U.S. ISS National Laboratory researchers.

    NASA faces several significant challenges that may impede efforts to maximize utilization of all ISS research facilities, including:

    -the impending retirement of the Space Shuttle in 2010 and reduced launch capabilities for transporting ISS research cargo once the shuttle retires,

    -high costs for launches and no dedicated funding to support research,

    -limited time available for research due to the fixed size of crew and competing demands for the crew's time, and an uncertain future for the ISS beyond 2015.

    NASA is researching the possibility of developing a management body -including internal and external elements- to manage ISS research, which would make the ISS National Laboratory similar to other national laboratories. Though there is no existing direct analogue to the ISS, GAO studied two national laboratories and several other large science institutions and identified three common practices that these institutions employ that could benefit the management of ISS research.

    Centralized management body: At each of the institutions GAO studied, there is a central body responsible for prioritizing and selecting research, even if there are different funding agencies. NASA's ISS managers are currently not responsible for evaluating and selecting all research that will be conducted on the ISS, leaving this to the research sponsor.

    In-house scientific and technical expertise: The institutions GAO studied have large staffs of in-house experts that can provide technical and engineering support to users. NASA's staff members in ISS fundamental science research areas have been decentralized or reassigned, limiting its capability to provide user support.

    Robust user outreach: The laboratories and institutes GAO studied place a high priority on user outreach and are actively involved in educating and recruiting users. NASA has conducted outreach to potential users in the public and private sectors, but its outreach is limited in comparison.

     


    Gerelateerd nieuws:
    17 oktober  Alleen het inzicht is niet voldoende