• A
  • A
  • De ondraaglijke lichtheid van hoger onderwijs

    - Terwijl universiteiten en hogescholen pretenderen op hoog niveau les te geven, lijkt de didactiek vaak op die van een ouderwetse middelbare school. Eric Jan van Rossum en Rebecca Hamer analyseren in hun UU-proefschrift het verschil tussen gewenste niveau en bereikte niveau van het hoger onderwijs.

    Met de uitkomst kan iedere docent zijn voordeel doen, zo schrijft Tim-Patrick Limmer (UvA-student).

    Does university teach for mediocrity? In their recent Ph.D.-thesis The Meaning of Learning and Knowing, Erik Jan van Rossum and Rebecca Hamer put forward arguments that support this assertion. By using their 6-stage model, the authors reveal how higher education is geared towards superficial learning.

    Van Rossum and Hamer conducted research to investigate how each of these stages is represented in Dutch higher education finding that 75 % of their sample understands learning as a means for simple reproduction of knowledge. The education system itself leaves little room for students to develop a deeper understanding reaching for stages 4 till 6. Even more, some research gives evidence that "students may become less likely to employ a deep approach" starting their tertiary study after high school.

    Instead of teaching for excellence, higher education teaches for mediocrity. Especially on bachelor level, students are being assessed superficially with standardized multiple choice tests. The teaching style itself is mostly didactic with the teacher standing in front of 100-200 students and flipping through PowerPoint-slides. Since no deeper understanding is required to pass courses, students do not even have to read in depth the material that is given out by the professor.

    6-Stage Model

    So what do these stages entail? On stage 1, learning is understood as the mere transmission of knowledge. Teachers teach without interacting with students who then simply memorize information 'sentence by sentence'. Learning on stage 2 involves the first quantitative reflection of the knowledge taught. Students memorize specific parts that are considered important for examinations later on and have certain possibilities to ask clarifying questions during classes. Like the first two stages, stage 3 also only involves reproductive learning. Here, students reflect even further what knowledge might be useful for practical applications later on in their life.

    Most university education is based on those first three stages. Higher education, however, should entail more than superficially memorizing information. Van Rossum and Hamer see a watershed between stage 3 and 4 where students shift their concept of learning from reproducing knowledge to constructing meaning. In stage 4, students develop the capability to think within a scientific theory and gain a critical awareness of its assumptions.

    But only at stage 5, students start to expand their thinking beyond disciplinary borders and apply their knowledge to give meaning to their reality. This involves teachers functioning predominantly as guides who are specialists in their respective fields. The topic is explored in group discussions where professor and student represent equal partners. Such teaching techniques lose their relevance once teaching proceeds to stage 6. Van Rossum and Hamer state that here the focus shifts from 'learning-to-know' to 'learning-to-be'. Students develop an increased self-awareness and see learning as key element of answering the question 'Who am I?' In order to achieve this stage, professors have to truly find their 'inner voice' and create an atmosphere of mutual trust and sharing in their class.

    Teaching for Mediocrity

    This mindset of "just studying what is necessary" contributes to another phenomenon widespread in Dutch universities: the 'zesjescultuur'. In an environment where you are not challenged to learn in a deeper fashion you may also lack the ambition to do much for your studies in the first place. Dutch universities have responded to this trend by implementing more study components such as Honours programs. Students that reach a certain average are able to take additional courses resulting in an extra qualification for your degree. However, what course designers should keep in mind is that reaching excellence does not mean to simply teach more. Instead, it is about the way students are taught and the environment that is created to create true learning.

    Tim-Patrick Limmer studies Economics at the University of Amsterdam and worked as an editorial intern for ScienceGuide.