• A
  • A
  • Japan plans €1,9 billion research merger

    - Facing rampant budget growth, policymakers in Japan plan to merge five research institutes into one in order to cut costs and implement governance changes. In total, these organizations account for over 5400 researchers, staff members and a total budget equivalent to €1,9 billion.

    With 220%, Japan has the highest public debt to GDP deficit worldwide. At the same time the government is fighting with an aging population that it expects to shrink by 1/3 until 2060. This strains both public budgets and quality in higher education as highlighted in a recent Astronomy controversy over the sun orbiting earth.

    Slashing wasteful spending

    Now, the government announced to consolidate its budget with tax hikes and spending cuts. One major target will be the Japanese research industry. Policymakers want to merge the five largest public R&D institutes into one in order to save money on overhead costs and enhancing governance.

    According to Nature magazine, RIKEN, NIMS, JAMSTEC, NIED and JST would all be combined into one organization combining a current total budget of €1,9 billion and 5400 researchers and staff members. "This is the result of our aim to create the world's leading science and technology while slashing wasteful spending and making the organization as compact as possible," commented Tenzo Okumura, senior vice-minister of the education and science ministry.

    Cutting costs at the expense of research output

    Researchers, however, warn that this cost-saving move might go at the expense of overall output. "The plan isn't intended to improve the research system. Each of the institutes has fundamentally different characteristics, so I feel they would be very difficult to integrate effectively," stated Tasuku Honjo, molecular biologist at Kyoto University and former member of the government's science advisory body CSTP.

    NIMS President, Sukekatsu Ushioda, criticizes governance changes that will be part of the reform package. "Currently, the NIMS president has sufficient authority, so the decision-making process is fast. We at NIMS can often take new actions shortly after a board meeting. But if a higher management is added above NIMS, the decision-making would be slower and it would be difficult to take dynamic approaches."