• A
  • A
  • EU innovation strategy too complicated

    - Much EU funding has been allocated to research, the impact is meager. The big 4 advisory firm Ernst & Young scrutinized the EU innovation strategy and recommends greater stream-lining and investments into IT infrastructure. Inspiration can be found in South-Korea, Japan and the US.

    Ernst & Young, one of the big 4 financial advisory firms created a critical report over the current EU innovation strategy. The report authors urge EU officials and member state governments to rethink their current policy. Currently, too much funding dwindles away due to overly complicated funding mechanisms. Inspiration can be found in tech-nations like South-Korea, Japan and the US.

    Increase in funding, little impact

    "In the aftermath of the financial crisis and aware that the EU is facing increasing competition from the world's rapid-growth markets, recent years have seen a massive increase in public funding, a proliferation of lines of action, the creation of communities , platforms, infrastructures and even a dedicated initiative - Innovation Union."

    "However, this wide array of action - all of which have been created with best intentions - have not generated the expected level of success. Europe will again miss its goal of achieving a level of R&D of 3% of GDP by 2020. And the European Commission's projections to 2050 show that the EU Member States' (EU27) share of global patents is set to fall from 40% to approximately 20%. This is all despite the fact that the EU27 forms the world's largest single market. Why is this the case?"

    Five challenges for an Innovation Union

    Ernst & Young identifies five areas where the EU faces challenges.

    1. Innovation Policy is too complicated

    Overlapping programs and inefficient decision-making processes have created a situation where much of the EU funding has little impact on outcomes.

    2. R&D gap

    While public R&D spending increased significantly, private spending is still too low compared to other leading nations (USA, South Korea, Japan).

    3. Sectoral competitiveness and IT issues

    EU firms specialize too much on low-tech goods and services. Japan (electric components, audiovisual electronics, telecommunications) and the US (medical equipment) focus more on a technology intensive economy.

    4. Inadequate infrastructure

    Both broadband reach and computing infrastructures in the EU are limited.

    5. Limited financing options

    A lack of financial market harmonization hampers cross-border joint ventures and the creation of funds where they are needed most urgently.

    Three layers to success

    Having analyzed these five weaknesses, the E&Y report continues with three recommendations. Firstly, "governments should act as leaders and innovators by creating the main building blocks of an innovative environment - world-class infrastructure, a high-performing education system and research and innovation-friendly legal rules." Secondly, "governments should create funding and facilitating initiatives to strengthen links between researchers, entrepreneurs and private investors, possibly with the help of public funds and tax credits."

    Finally, E&Y states that "government has the key task of 'nudging' existing innovation efforts toward long-term policy goals. This should mostly occur through the strategic use of public procurement and launching a limited number of partnerships that address key long-term market failures."

    To read the full report, click here.